Most Active

The Acer Aspire 2003WLMi has a great-quality, widescreen display and loads of power - but it's too expensive to appeal to anyone but hardened DVD fanatics. There's also plenty of storage space on the Acer Aspire 2003WLMi's 60GB hard disk - great for storing things like MP3s and video files. If you want to make backup copies of your data, there's also a DVD-RAM DVD writer. Further storage options are offered by a four-in-one card reader located at the front of the notebook, which works with Secure Digital, Smart Media, MMC and Memory Stick cards. There's also a single Type II PC Card slot. The Acer Aspire 2003WLMi is a cracking notebook. It offers plenty of power, its screen looks great, it's perfect for DVDs, and there's plenty of storage space for music and video files. What stops the Aspire getting an award is its average battery life and its whopping great price tag. At nearly fifteen hundred quid, you'd have to be really mad about watching movies on the move.

Canon PowerShot Pro1 officinado score:

Canon PowerShot Pro1 user average rating: 1.0

last modified:

Canon

John Morgan ()	0.0 / 5	Mon 16 Mar 09
Any one know which is better, this camera of the Canon EOS 300D. considering buying one of the two. Has any one used both of them and can give a honest review?

Alf jones ()	0.0 / 5	Mon 16 Mar 09
Had both cameras as Birthday gifts on same day. I only shoot in raw using fotoshop CS. After 3 mths trial, it must be said, at A3 size prints the canon Pro 1 was the better camera. As for handling and weight, don't forget you need extra lenses for the 300D, the Pro 1 came out tops. Both cameras are PHOTOGRAPHERS CAMERAS and need a lot of imput. But the end result is great pictures. Most of my fotografy is taken on a tripod, therefore I am able to use 50iso in the Pro 1 to good effect. The 28-200 zoom lens does it for me. And don't forgrt you never have to clean the camera innards. Good shooting-----Alf

Andy Drummond ()	0.0 / 5	Mon 16 Mar 09
Iv'e just opted to buy a Pro 1 rather than the EOS because of the economy of the Pro 1 zoom, compared to buying an Eos and then having to shell out another £400 for a comparable zoom. Admittedly though, for an expectation of higher quality results for the higher price.

Andy Drummond ()	0.0 / 5	Mon 16 Mar 09
Iv'e just opted to buy a Pro 1 rather than the EOS because of the economy of the Pro 1 zoom, compared to buying an Eos and then having to shell out another £400 for a comparable zoom. Admittedly though, for an expectation of higher quality results for the higher price.

CARL HAMILTON ()	5.0 / 5	Mon 16 Mar 09
HELLO EVERYONE ! THE CANON POWERSHOT PRO 1 IS SUCH A REMARKABLE DIGITAL CAMERA EVEN BY TODAY'S STANDARD . I JUST WONDER WHY CANON SEEMED TO HAVE STOPPED FIELDING A MUCH RECENT VERSION . THIS CAMERA PROMISES A LOT TO SERIOUS PHOTOGRAPHERS WHO DO NOT WANT THE BULK USUSALLY ASSOCIATED WITH DSLR KITS . THIS CAMERA CAN FURTHER SHINE IF CANON DECIDES TO PAIR ITS VERY GOOD LENS WITH A 35MM FULL-FRAME HIGH RESOLUTION CMOS SENSOR . DOES ANYBODY KNOW IF CANON HAS PLANS TO UPGRADE THE POWERSHOT PRO 1 ?